|
 
General Introduction
News
Board Roster
Fee Schedule
Contact Us
|
|
|
March 2004
Release of ARE Version 3.0 Affecting Delivery
of Multiple-Choice Division Score Reports
Washington, DCThe rumors are
true. Because NCARB is completing one of its periodic updates on
the standard of performance for the Architect Registration Examination,
candidates who have taken ARE multiple-choice divisions since February
2, 2004, will receive their score reports by late April-early May.
This delay is a direct result of NCARBs efforts to convene
and conduct a Cut Score Study, which will establish a passing threshold
for each multiple-choice division of the recently released ARE Version
3.0. At this point, the Council is not holding scores; scores cannot
be calculated until the data is analyzed and the Cut Score Study
is completed.
The Cut Score Study is a necessary part of all licensure programs
and is guided by industry protocols for testing and measurement
when establishing new passing standards. To that end, NCARB must
ensure that a valid random sampling of each multiple-choice division
is collected and analyzed. The size of the sample comprises approximately
six weeks of administrations. These samples also must represent
the full spectrum of candidate ability.
NCARB sought to minimize candidate inconvenience and to strengthen
the results by not announcing the Cut Score Study in advance. An
advance announcement could have increased the amount of time needed
to collect data primarily because the number of candidates testing
could have decreased. Any decrease would negatively impact the sampling
and skew the results. If candidates were to postpone testing, NCARB
would not have had enough solutions to analyze, potentially affecting
efforts to fairly and effectively establish the standard of performance.
With the exception of the Mechanical & Electrical Systems division,
it has been seven years since NCARB organized a Cut Score Study.
After more than a years worth of planning, the Council chose
to link the study with the introduction of ARE Version 3.0. Approximately
90 practicing architects from the U.S. and Canada will be taking
part in the study at the end of March. They are a diverse group
of practitioners, representing all ages, regions, and practice levels,
including those recently licensed. Their objective will be to accurately
correlate passing performance and the knowledge, skills, and abilities
necessary to practice architecture independently. Conducting the
most effective cut score process and protecting the public health,
safety, and welfare remain the focus of this initiative.
The Councils Board of Directors will confirm the threshold
at their mid-April meeting. Score reports will then be released
to state boards during the last week of April. NCARB specifically
chose this time of the year to conduct the study for two important
reasons. First, historically speaking, the highest level of administrations
takes place during February and March. Second, the study had to
coincide with a meeting of the NCARB Board of Directors. Any delays
in data collection would have created a domino effect. The Board
will not meet again until June, thus delaying their review of the
standard and the subsequent release of multiple-choice division
score reports.
Although NCARB has attempted to organize a process that has the
least negative effect on candidates, the Council realizes that this
delay is frustrating. Regardless of when a Cut Score Study is actually
conducted (now and in the future), candidates testing during that
specific time frame will be impacted. NCARB recognizes candidates
concern and evaluated several alternative schedules to most effectively
complete the process.
In the event that a failing score is reported, the six-month waiting
period between administrations is based on the day the division
was takennot the day the score was reported. The Cut Score
Study only affects the AREs six multiple-choice divisions.
There is no delay in the reporting of graphic divisions.
The Cut Score Study is intrinsically linked to the professions
commitment to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. By
engaging in a periodic assessment of the passing standard, NCARB
verifies and maintains the integrity and validity of the ARE. This
process is especially important when new exam content is released,
as is the case with ARE Version 3.0.
For more information about the ARE, contact the Councils Professional
Development directorate at 202/783-6500 or visit the ARE
section of NCARB's web site for online resources including the
newly updated ARE Guidelines Version
3.0.
|