In addition to NCARB’s secure database of actions taken by the 55 licensing boards members, NCARB maintains a list of individuals who have been publicly reprimanded by NCARB’s Board of Directors.
Disciplinary Action Process
The majority of NCARB’s disciplinary actions are issued as a response to actions taken by one of the U.S. licensing boards. In some cases, such as misconduct by an Architect Registration Examination® (ARE®) candidate, NCARB may take disciplinary action independently of a licensing board.
In such cases, NCARB’s Board of Directors makes a final disciplinary decision based upon the following actions:
- After being made aware of the misconduct, NCARB staff conduct a thorough investigation into the situation.
- Any relevent findings are reported to NCARB’s Professional Conduct Committee, which is made up of volunteer architects and other professionals.
- The Professional Conduct Committee reviews the case in terms of any violation of NCARB’s standards of professional conduct, including the ARE Candidate Agreement.
- The Professional Conduct Committee recommends any suggested disciplinary action determined per the committee’s Rules of Procedure to NCARB’s Board of Directors.
- The Board of Directors reviews the case and acts upon the Professional Conduct Committee’s recommendations.
- Any disciplinary action taken is reported to the appropriate jurisdiction’s licensing board.
Public Reprimands
| Name | Residence | Misconduct | Date | Disciplinary Action Taken |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard B. Paszkiet | Oak Lawn, Illinois | Violated NCARB Rules of Procedure (section V.C.1.a.i) | June 2026 | Public reprimand, suspension of NCARB Certificate for five years, requirement to complete three hours of ethics education per year of the five-year suspension period (15 hours total), demonstration that no disciplinary action has been taken against the architect by any U.S. jurisdiction during the suspension period |